Advantages of the retrosigmoid approach in auditory brain stem implantation

Citation
V. Colletti et al., Advantages of the retrosigmoid approach in auditory brain stem implantation, SKULL BAS S, 10(4), 2000, pp. 165-170
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SKULL BASE SURGERY
ISSN journal
10521453 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
165 - 170
Database
ISI
SICI code
1052-1453(2000)10:4<165:AOTRAI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
From April 1997 to December 1999, six patients (five men and one woman), ra nging in age from 22 to 37 years with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were o perated on via the classic retrosigmoid-transmeatal (RS-TM) approach for re moval of a vestibular schwannoma (VS) (tumor size from 12 to 40 mm) and for auditory brain stem implantation (ABI). After tumor removal, the floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsa l cochlear nucleus were reached, and the ABI was inserted. More recently, a n ABI was implanted via the retrosigmoid approach in a 4-year-old boy with a malformation (common cavity) associated with cochlear nerve aplasia. Elec trically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABRs) and neural response t elemetry (NRT) were performed to verify the correct positioning of the inse rted electrodes. No major complications related to ABI were observed. ABI h as been activated to date in five of the NF2 patients. Auditory sensations with various numbers of electrodes were evoked in all patients. We consider the RS-TM approach the route of choice for ABI insertion in patients with NF2 and good hearing, offering a chance of hearing preservation, and in pat ients with complete cochlear ossification, severe head trauma and cochlear fracture, or nerve disruption, or a combination of these. A new indication for ABI implantation via the RS approach is presented by patients with bila teral cochlear nerve aplasia.