While most strategic group research has focused on performance implications
, we consider the relationship between strategic group membership and reput
ation. Using strategic group identity and domain consensus concepts, we pro
pose strategic groups have different reputations. We find significant diffe
rences exist in reputation across three identified strategic groups of US.
property/casualty insurers, supporting our contention that reputation is a
multilevel concept. Post hoc analyses suggest strategic groups with higher
reputation also have higher performance on some critical measures, indicati
ng reputation may be a mobility barrier beneficial to members of certain gr
oups. Practitioner implications include challenges of within-group differen
tiation in firm reputation. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.