For the understanding of the mechanism of a superconducting transition, it
is of great interest to clarify what the energy scale in determining the cr
itical temperature T-c is. According to the BCS mean-field theory, the ener
gy gap at T much less than T-c, 2 Delta (o), is proportional to T-c; 2 Delt
a (o) = 4.3k(B)T(c) for d-wave superconductors. In the case of high-T-c cup
rates, however, 2 Delta (o) increases monotonically with the lowering of th
e hole-doping level p even in the underdoped region, where T-c is largely s
uppressed, and does not scale with T-c, except in a highly overdoped region
. Interestingly, in a wide p range spreading over the under- and overdoped
regions, 2 Delta (o) is almost proportional to crossover temperature T*, ar
ound which a spin gap and/or a (small) pseudogap of almost the same energy
scale as 2 Delta (o) start to develop progressively; 2 Delta (o)/k(B)T* is
nearly independent of p and comparable to the BCS value in the entire p ran
ge examined. On the other hand, 2 Delta (o)/k(B)T(c) is inversely proportio
nal to p, 2 Delta (o)/k(B)T(c) similar to 1/p, except in the highly overdop
ed region, where T-c is very close to the BCS expectation. This indicates t
hat the energy scale in determining T-c is of order p Delta (o) in high-T-c
cuprates. In this article, we will discuss some scenarios for the transiti
on from pseudogap to superconducting states, where the energy scale in dete
rmining T-c is expected to be of order p Delta (o).