The purpose of the work described in this paper was to explore links that m
ay exist between conformational bias in macrocyclic products and the ease w
ith which they are formed in solid phase SNAr reactions. Solid phase synthe
sis of compounds 2 proceeds more efficiently than of compounds 3 under simi
lar conditions. Compounds 2 were designed to mimic p-turn conformations in
the dipeptide residues whereas compounds 3 were thought to be unable to sho
w a similar conformational preference. The second assertion was shown to be
correct but, surprisingly, CD, NMR, and molecular simulation experiments f
or 2a indicate another conformation is preferred in solution. This may invo
lve H-bonding of the asparagine side-chain to a backbone amide-carbonyl. Mo
lecular dynamics simulations indicate that cyclization to form compound 2a
is statistically more favorable than that to form 3a. (C) 2000 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd. All rights reserved.