The authors develop an institutional choice framework to examine and interp
ret change in local boundaries and provide a single explanation for the use
of varied instruments to create new boundaries or expand old ones. Boundar
y decisions am viewed as the product of actors' seeking particular outcomes
within a context of existing governments and established rules governing b
oundary change. Selective costs and benefits, rather than collective costs
and benefits, are most likely to provide incentives for institutional entre
preneurship and collective action. Such a framework is valuable because it
integrates the fragmented literatures on local boundaries, provides a linka
ge between boundary choices and policy outcomes at the local level, and can
guide empirical research into the causes and consequences of boundary chan
ge. This framework: can provide the foundation of a more general model of i
nstitutional choice and institutional entrepreneurship.