S. Meyer et al., PRESSURE TRANSMISSION RATIO - IS IT A RELIABLE PARAMETER IN INCREASEDURETHRO-VESICAL JUNCTION MOBILITY, Neurourol. urodyn., 16(4), 1997, pp. 277-284
Our objective was to investigate ally correlation between the degree o
f urethro-vesical junction (UVJ) mobility and the pressure transmissio
n ratio (PTR) values. Five hundred and nineteen patients suffering fro
m stress urinary incontinence were divided into four groups according
to their degree of UVJ mobility assessed by the Q-tip test method: gro
up 1 (N = 86), urethral axis at stress (UAS) <30 degrees; group 2 (N =
191), UAS 31-60 degrees; group 3 (:N = 214), UAS 61-90 degrees; and g
roup 4 (N = 28), UAS >90 degrees. A urethral pressure profile at stres
s was determined in the supine and standing positions, and PTR was cal
culated in the middle region of urethral functional length. PTR values
for groups 2-4 were compared with those for group I. In the supine po
sition, the values for groups 3 and 4 were lower than for group 1, whi
le in the standing position, only the values for group 3 were differen
t. The incidence of normal PTR values (i.e., >90%) was the same in all
four groups. Overall correlation between PTR values and degree of UVJ
mobility was weak (r = 0.14). We conclude that PTR values does not co
rrelate with UVJ mobility in those patients with a Q-tip test of <60 d
egrees. This correlation is inconstant when the Q-tip test was >60 deg
rees. Also, 14-30% of patients in all four groups had normal standing
PTR values. This may be explained by well-preserved innervation with s
evere alteration of the anchoring bladder neck structures. (C) 1997 Wi
ley-Liss, Inc.