Br. Carr et H. Ory, ESTROGEN AND PROGESTIN COMPONENTS OF ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES - RELATIONSHIP TO VASCULAR-DISEASE, Contraception, 55(5), 1997, pp. 267-272
Recently, new information has been published about: a) the relationshi
p between combination oral contraceptives (OCs), estrogen dose, cigare
tte smoking, and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke; an
d b) the effect of different progestins on the risk of venous thromboe
mbolism (VTE). We review the epidemiologic data. Regardless of age, in
the absence of smoking, use of sub-50 mu g OCs is not associated with
any meaningful increase in risk of MI or stroke. If the small, statis
tically nonsignificant elevations in risk for these diseases are assum
ed (for the sake of argument) so be causal, then the incidence of MI a
nd stroke associated with use of OCs containing less than 50 mu g ethi
nyl estradiol (EE) would be approximately 2 per 100,000 per year. For
women less than 35 years of age who do not smoke or do not have a hist
ory of hypertension, the risk would be even lower. Any woman over the
age of 35 who smokes should be advised to use a non-estrogen or nonhor
monal contraceptive. There are now two reports, from lick et al. and L
ewis et al., that demonstrate that the relative risk of MI is certainl
y no greater for users of OCs containing desogestrel or gestodene than
for users of OCs containing older progestins. In fact, both show redu
ced relative risks for the newer progestins compared to the older ones
. With respect to progestins, four recent epidemiologic studies have i
ndicated a twofold increased risk of nonfatal VTE with use of OCs cont
aining desogestrel or gestodene compared with levonorgestrel. A fifth
report, which showed an increased relative risk for norgestimate, is b
ased on use among only 19 cases and 31 controls and is not statistical
ly significant. As the authors themselves caution and as subsequent fo
llow-up analyses and editorials conclude, these studies do not provide
evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship between OCs containing d
esogestrel or gestodene, and VTE. The recommendation with respect to d
esogestrel- and gestodene-containing OCs is that no change in prescrib
ing practices is warranted for either current or new-start patients. T
here is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that OCs containing 3
0 or 35 mu g of EE have lower risks of MI, stroke, and VTE than higher
dose OCs. However, there is no epidemiologic study that demonstrates
a greaser risk of vascular events among women using OCs containing 30
or 35 mu g EE compared with preparations containing 20 mu g EE Users o
f sub-50 mu g OCs of any age have no clinically meaningful increase in
incidence of MI or stroke compared with non-OC users. This is also tr
ue for smokers under the age of 35 years who use OCs. However, smokers
over the age of 35 years who use OCs still have an unacceptably high
incidence rate of MI and stroke and should not use combination OCs. Su
b-50 mu g OCs of all types are associated with a small excess risk of
VTE, about 15 per 100,000 events per year. Until there is biologic exp
lanation of the twofold greater risk of VTE in users of OCs containing
desogestrel or gestodene compared with users of those containing olde
r progestins, this association should not be accepted as one of cause
and effect. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.