Occupational asthma in adults in six Canadian communities

Citation
Ar. Johnson et al., Occupational asthma in adults in six Canadian communities, AM J R CRIT, 162(6), 2000, pp. 2058-2062
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1073449X → ACNP
Volume
162
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2058 - 2062
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(200012)162:6<2058:OAIAIS>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
We examined the prevalence, population attributable risk (PAR), and clinica l characteristics of occupational asthma (OA) in a randomly selected popula tion in six communities in Canada. Our study followed the European Communit y Respiratory Health Survey protocol. A randomly selected population of 18, 701 (87% response rate) persons from the study communities, ranging in age from 20 to 44 yr, completed an initial questionnaire, of whom 2,974 (39% re sponse rate) attended the laboratory and completed supplementary questionna ires. Of these latter individuals, 383 had asthma, Asthma was defined as ph ysician-diagnosed asthma, and adult-onset asthma was defined as a first att ack at age 15 yr or older. We used several methods for estimating OA as fol lows: (1) reporting of a high-risk job (occupation and industry) for OA at the time of asthma onset (Probable GA); (2) reporting of exposure to a subs tance that may cause OA (Possible OA) while not in a high-risk job at the t ime of asthma onset; and (3) combination of the PAR for high-risk jobs and exposures. The prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of Probable OA and Possible OA combined was 36.1% (31.3 to 41.0%) among subjects with adult-o nset asthma. The occupations most commonly reported in association with OA were nursing in the Probable OA group and clerical and food preparation in the Possible OA group. The clinical characteristics and exposures reported by both groups were similar. The PAR for adult-onset asthma in high-risk jo bs and exposures was 18.2%. The assessment of occupation and industry alone , rather than of exposures, may underestimate the contribution of occupatio nal exposures to asthma prevalence.