Surgical treatment of post-traumatic or neoplastic bone defects often repre
sents a problem in orthopaedic routine. Autologous tissue always stands for
the first choice material. The recent therapeutic approaches for tissue re
pair of bone defects attempt to mimic the natural process of bone repair by
delivering a source of cells capable of differentiating into osteoblasts.
In this study two different types of human osteoblast cell harvesting were
compared in primary cell culture to evaluate the best way to obtain cells f
or clinical use. Numerous articles describe the characteristics of each one
of these systems, but there is no report comparing the influence of these
different isolation techniques on cell growth. Cultures fi om 22 bone speci
mens obtained fi om donors were established in two different ways and their
proliferation was compared. An enzymatic procedure to extract human osteob
lasts (hOB(col)) was used in one group; spontaneous cells outgrowth, human
osteoblasts (hOBsog) was expected in the other group. Cells of both groups
were characterised as osteoblasts by immunohistochemical staining with Bone
Morphogenetic Protein-2,4 (BMP-2,4), expression of collagen type I as well
as the amount of alkaline phophatase activity (ALP) detected in the cell c
ultures. We found that the time needed in primary cultures till confluence
was dependent on the age of the donors as well as on the method of cell har
vesting. Cells from under 65-year old donors were growing significantly fas
ter by the hOB(col) method as compared to hOB(sog) 20.57+/-2.99 days vs. 30
.00+/-4.36. Cells harvested from donors older than 65 yeats of age needed 2
3.88+/-2.95 in the hOB(col) compared to 34.25+/-4.27 days in the other grou
p. In the experimental cultures, after one passage with trypsin/EDTA, there
was a significant difference between the two groups. There was an improved
cell growth in the hOB(sog) group found on days 8, 9 and 10 of cultivation
. Immuno-histochemical staining as well as ALP activity were similar in bot
h groups. In conclusion this study evaluated an important step for a tissue
engineering approach to the repair of bone defects, which may have clinica
l applications in post-traumatic orthopaedic surgery.