Typology and behaviour of tuna aggregations around fish aggregating devices from acoustic surveys in French Polynesia

Citation
E. Josse et al., Typology and behaviour of tuna aggregations around fish aggregating devices from acoustic surveys in French Polynesia, AQU LIV RES, 13(4), 2000, pp. 183-192
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES
ISSN journal
09907440 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
183 - 192
Database
ISI
SICI code
0990-7440(200007/08)13:4<183:TABOTA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Eighty-seven two-hour acoustic surveys (radius 0.8 nautical mile, vertical range 0-500 m) around 17 fish aggregating devices (FADs) were conducted in French Polynesia between December 1995 and February 1997. Associated tuna d ensities were calculated using two different techniques: echo counting when the fish had sufficient distances from each other and echo integration whe n the fish swam close together tin schools). No acoustic detection of tuna was observed during 27 of the 87 surveys, representing 81 % of all the noct urnal surveys and 15 % Of the diurnal ones. The 60 other surveys showed thr ee different classes of aggregations: (1) 'deep scattered fish', observed 4 5 times, (2) 'intermediate scattered fish', observed 16 times, and (3) 'sha llow schooling fish', observed 16 times. Sometimes aggregations of differen t classes were observed beneath the same FAD. The size of the fish inside t he aggregations (determined from target strength values), the distance betw een the individuals, and the depth of the fish all decreased from 'deep sca ttered fish' to 'shallow schooling fish' (100-300 m for 'deep scattered fis h', 50-150 m for 'intermediate scattered fish', and above the depth of 50 m for 'shallow schooling fish'). Fish densities also varied according to the class of aggregations: 7.3, 26, and 801 fish pel km(3) on average for 'dee p scattered fish', 'intermediate scattered fish', and 'shallow schooling fi sh', respectively. The highest densities were observed during daytime, whil e night-time observations indicated a variety of situations, from the absen ce of individuals to large amounts of fish. (C) 2000 Ifremer/CNRS/INRA/IRD/ Cemagref/Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.