Two approaches to the study of aging are contrasted. The results and implic
ations of the gene-by-gene, hypothetico-deductive molecular genetic approac
h are compared with studies engendered by unique empirical findings. The fo
rmer hypothesis-testing approach examines the changing phenotype that resul
ts from alterations of the genome and measures the relevance of a gene by t
he effectiveness with which it alters life-span. Investigations of empirica
l demographic and physiological puzzles that have come to light in aging st
udies, examine these phenomena for the broader understanding they bring rat
her than the knowledge of specific causative genetic elements. While the fo
rmer hypothesis testing method requires caution in interpretation of result
s and conclusions, it has been highly informative. Studies of empirical phe
nomena have necessarily progressed more slowly, but have also yielded subst
antial gains. Both approaches have advanced the understanding of the aging
process from distinctly different but complementary viewpoints.