Population viability analysis (PVA) packages do not always allow realistic
simulation of particular life cycle features, so they may produce unrealist
ic predictions of extinction risk. This was suspected for a cycling Soay sh
eep population, Ovis aries L., that grows, overeats its habitat and then su
ffers high winter mortality. We compared projections of PVA models for the
sheep that incorporated either an unrealistic ceiling carrying capacity usi
ng INMAT (the only choice) and VORTEX (the default)? or realistic density d
ependence for survival (VORTEX). At year 50, the ceiling models predicted e
xtinction probabilities of 60.4% (INMAT) and 87.4% (VORTEX), compared to on
ly 4.6% for the density-dependent model. Small populations were equally lik
ely to increase or decrease with the ceiling models, while they had high pr
obabilities of increase with the density-dependent model, as found in reali
ty. PVA cannot be relied upon to produce realistic projections if inappropr
iate mechanisms of population regulation are used. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scienc
e Ltd. All rights reserved.