Background: Surgical treatment of end-stage faecal incontinence has its ori
gin in the early 1950s. Interest has been revived as a result of technical
advances achieved in the recent past. The purpose of this article is to rev
iew the principles that underlie the use of skeletal muscle transposition a
round the anal canal and of electrical stimulation in the treatment of inco
ntinence, and to explore new methods of treatment of this condition.
Methods: A literature search was performed using Pubmed and Medline, employ
ing keywords related to treatment of faecal incontinence by neosphincter re
construction. Basic science and clinical aspects of neosphincter reconstruc
tion were gathered from relevant texts, original articles and recently publ
ished abstracts.
Results: The electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter seems to be
the popular choice of biological neosphincter. It is more likely to produc
e higher resting anal canal pressures than the unstimulated neosphincter, a
nd hence improved continence. However, electrostimulator failure may result
in explantation in a proportion of patients. Impairment of evacuation is a
functional setback in approximately one-third of patients with the gracili
s neosphincter. Overall, improvement of continence may be expected in up to
90 per cent of patients according to some reports. By contrast, experience
with the artificial neosphincter, which is less expensive, has been limite
d to a few tertiary centres across the world. Reported continence of stool
is 100 per cent, and that of gas and stool 50 per cent, following implantat
ion of the artificial sphincter. Both of the above operations have been ass
ociated with implant-related infection and impaired evacuation.
Conclusion: Neoanal sphincter operations are technically demanding, require
a considerable learning experience and should be confined to specialist co
lorectal centres. Patients are likely to benefit from a plan that incorpora
tes preoperative counselling and a selective approach.