Imaging after head trauma: why, when and which

Authors
Citation
Da. Bruce, Imaging after head trauma: why, when and which, CHILD NERV, 16(10-11), 2000, pp. 755-759
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
ISSN journal
02567040 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
10-11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
755 - 759
Database
ISI
SICI code
0256-7040(200011)16:10-11<755:IAHTWW>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
CT scanning is the current first imaging technique to be used after head in jury, in those settings where a CT scan is available. The first scan is usu ally done without contrast enhancement. The value of CT is the demonstratio n of scalp, bone, extra-axial hematomas and parenchymal injury. It is rapid and easily done in the presence of the multiple monitors that many trauma patients have in place. It can be used to demonstrate the bony anatomy of t he spine and is good for evaluation of abdominal and chest trauma also. MRI is more sensitive for all posttraumatic lesions other than skull fracture and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and can demonstrate parenchymal spinal cord in jury. The cons are a longer scanning time, interference of the imaging by c ertain ICP monitors and problems with the positions of the monitoring equip ment and ventilators outside the MRI magnetic field. MRI will be used incre asingly to study early head injury because of its ability to measure cerebr al blood flow, cerebral blood volume and the location and extent of cerebra l edema. If the CT does not demonstrate pathology adequate to account for t he clinical state, MRI is warranted. Follow up is best done with MRI as it is more sensitive to parenchymal change than is CT.