CT scanning is the current first imaging technique to be used after head in
jury, in those settings where a CT scan is available. The first scan is usu
ally done without contrast enhancement. The value of CT is the demonstratio
n of scalp, bone, extra-axial hematomas and parenchymal injury. It is rapid
and easily done in the presence of the multiple monitors that many trauma
patients have in place. It can be used to demonstrate the bony anatomy of t
he spine and is good for evaluation of abdominal and chest trauma also. MRI
is more sensitive for all posttraumatic lesions other than skull fracture
and subarachnoid hemorrhage, and can demonstrate parenchymal spinal cord in
jury. The cons are a longer scanning time, interference of the imaging by c
ertain ICP monitors and problems with the positions of the monitoring equip
ment and ventilators outside the MRI magnetic field. MRI will be used incre
asingly to study early head injury because of its ability to measure cerebr
al blood flow, cerebral blood volume and the location and extent of cerebra
l edema. If the CT does not demonstrate pathology adequate to account for t
he clinical state, MRI is warranted. Follow up is best done with MRI as it
is more sensitive to parenchymal change than is CT.