A randomized controlled clinical trial on etimicin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic, versus netilmicin in the treatment of bacterial infections

Citation
Cy. Zhao et al., A randomized controlled clinical trial on etimicin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic, versus netilmicin in the treatment of bacterial infections, CHIN MED J, 113(11), 2000, pp. 1026-1030
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
03666999 → ACNP
Volume
113
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1026 - 1030
Database
ISI
SICI code
0366-6999(200011)113:11<1026:ARCCTO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of two aminoglycoside antibiot ics, etimicin and netilmicin, in the treatment of bacterial infections. Methods A randomized, open label, controlled clinical trial was conducted f or the treatment of 65 patients hospitalized with respiratory tract infecti ons, urinary tract infections, and skin and tissue infections. Thirty-four patients received etimicin and thirty-one patients received netilmicin at a dose of 100 mg every 12 hours by intravenous infusion. The duration of tre atment was 7-10 days in both groups. Results 47 patients were enrolled in the etimicin group; 35 patients were a ssessable for safety and 34 patients were assessable for efficacy, 46 patie nts were enrolled in the netilmicin group; 32 patients were assessable for safety and 31 patients were assessable for efficacy. The results show that overall efficacy was 85.3% for the etimicin group and 83.9% for the netilmi cin group, whereas bacterial clearance rates were 87.5% for the etimicin gr oup and 89.7% for the netilmicin group. The incidence of adverse reactions was 8.6% (3/35) and 9.4% (3/32), respectively. Conclusion Etimicin and netilmicin were effective and safe for the treatmen t of respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, and skin and tis sue infections. The results show there was no statistically significant dif ference between the two groups (P>0.05).