Cy. Zhao et al., A randomized controlled clinical trial on etimicin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic, versus netilmicin in the treatment of bacterial infections, CHIN MED J, 113(11), 2000, pp. 1026-1030
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of two aminoglycoside antibiot
ics, etimicin and netilmicin, in the treatment of bacterial infections.
Methods A randomized, open label, controlled clinical trial was conducted f
or the treatment of 65 patients hospitalized with respiratory tract infecti
ons, urinary tract infections, and skin and tissue infections. Thirty-four
patients received etimicin and thirty-one patients received netilmicin at a
dose of 100 mg every 12 hours by intravenous infusion. The duration of tre
atment was 7-10 days in both groups.
Results 47 patients were enrolled in the etimicin group; 35 patients were a
ssessable for safety and 34 patients were assessable for efficacy, 46 patie
nts were enrolled in the netilmicin group; 32 patients were assessable for
safety and 31 patients were assessable for efficacy. The results show that
overall efficacy was 85.3% for the etimicin group and 83.9% for the netilmi
cin group, whereas bacterial clearance rates were 87.5% for the etimicin gr
oup and 89.7% for the netilmicin group. The incidence of adverse reactions
was 8.6% (3/35) and 9.4% (3/32), respectively.
Conclusion Etimicin and netilmicin were effective and safe for the treatmen
t of respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, and skin and tis
sue infections. The results show there was no statistically significant dif
ference between the two groups (P>0.05).