The Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ): a valid tool for assessing the rehabilitation needs of disabled people

Citation
P. Kersten et al., The Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ): a valid tool for assessing the rehabilitation needs of disabled people, CLIN REHAB, 14(6), 2000, pp. 641-650
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
641 - 650
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(200012)14:6<641:TSNAQ(>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To validate the Southampton Needs Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ ) for use with disabled people during face-to-face interviews. Design: The SNAG was designed to be used in a cross-sectional survey of dis abled people with a physical disability with a follow-up study one year lat er. Content and criterion validity was examined using 32 disabled people wh o took part in the pilot study. Construct validity and internal reliability was examined using data from 93 disabled people who took part in the main survey. Responsiveness of the questionnaire was evaluated using the data ga thered during a follow-up study of 77 people had taken part in the original study. Outcome measures: The OPCS Disability Severity Scales (OPCS) and the Functi onal Independence Measure (FIM) were used to measure level of disability of participants, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the UK version of th e SF-36 to examine perceived health status. Participants: People with a primary physical disability, aged 16-65, random ly selected from two disability registers in southern England. Main results: Content and criterion validity were established. Construct va lidity and internal reliability of the SNAG was good. Inter-rater reliabili ty was not tested since only one researcher conducted the interviews. Test- retest reliability was not formally tested because of the probability that participants would learn from the first needs assessment questionnaire and that different results on a retest occasion could arise from this. The SNAQ was sensitive in picking up changes over time. Conclusion: The SNAQ has shown good validity (content, coverage and constru ct), internal reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness. Further studies are needed to define the consequences of meeting or not meeting the rehabil itation needs of disabled people. inter-rater reliability remains to be est ablished.