Eg. Arnau et al., Identification of Lilial (R) as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships, CONTACT DER, 43(6), 2000, pp. 351-358
Fragrance materials are among the most common causes of allergic contact de
rmatitis. The aim of this study was to identify in a perfume fragrance alle
rgens not included in the fragrance mix, by use of bioassay-guided chemical
fractionation and chemical analysis/structure-activity relationships (SARs
). The basis for the investigation was a 45-year-old woman allergic to her
own perfume. She had a negative patch test to the fragrance mix and agreed
to participate in the study. Chemical fractionation of the perfume concentr
ate was used for repeated patch testing and/or repeated open application te
st on the pre-sensitized patient. The chemical composition of the fractions
giving a positive patch-test response and repeated open application test r
eactions was obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. From the com
pounds identified, those that contained a "structural alert" in their chemi
cal structure, indicating an ability to modify skin proteins and thus behav
e as a skin sensitizer, were tested on the patient. The patient reacted pos
itively to the synthetic fragrance p-t-butyl-alpha -methylhydrocinnamic ald
ehyde (Lilial(R)), a widely used fragrance compound not present in the frag
rance mix. The combination of bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and ch
emical analysis/structure-activity relationships seems to be a valuable too
l for the investigation of contact allergy to fragrance materials.