Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors
G. Fischmeister et Hn. Gadner, Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors, CURR OPIN H, 7(3), 2000, pp. 150-155
The harvesting of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after granulocy
te colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating f
actor stimulation instead of bone marrow in healthy donors has become incre
asingly popular. Donors, given the choice between bone marrow and PBPC dona
tion, often prefer cytapheresis because of the easier access, no necessity
for general anesthesia, and no multiple bone marrow punctures, In addition,
accelerated engraftment and immunomodulation by granulocyte colony-stimula
ting factor-mobilized PBPCs are advantageous for the recipient. However! be
cause of donor inconvenience and poor mobilization, there is a need to deve
lop improved procedures. Aspects such as durability of hematopoietic engraf
tment, characterization of the earliest stem cell, and composition of PBPCs
are not yet well defined, and international donor registration and follow-
up must be considered when evaluating long-term safety profiles in healthy
donors. This review concentrates on the most significant developments on mo
bilization of PBPCs published during the past year. (C) 2000 Lippincott Wil
liams & Wilkins, Inc.