Autoimmune markers in slow type 1 diabetes: Confrontation to type 1 diabetes

Citation
R. Desailloud et al., Autoimmune markers in slow type 1 diabetes: Confrontation to type 1 diabetes, DIABETE MET, 26(5), 2000, pp. 353-360
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETES & METABOLISM
ISSN journal
12623636 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
353 - 360
Database
ISI
SICI code
1262-3636(200011)26:5<353:AMIST1>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Slow onset type 1 diabetes is an heterogeneous entity. its clinical feature s may mimick type 2 diabetes but its pathophysiological mechanisms are clos e to type 1 diabetes. Aim of the study: To find out the frequencies, levels and associations of I CA, GADab and IA-2ab in type 2 diabetic patients with atypical phenotype. T o compare it to type 1 diabetes. Patients and methods: 1CA, GADab and IA-2ab were determined in: -61 patient s (age at diagnosis 48.2 +/- 10, range 36-73 years) with an initial diagnos is of type 2 diabetes but having at least one symptom suggesting a slow typ e 1 diabetes (loss of weight, absence of obesity at diagnosis or secondary failure of oral hypoglycaemic agents). -70 patients with type 1 diabetes (a ge 18 +/- 8.9, range 2-35 years). Clinical data evaluated in slow type 1 we re maximal BMI, BMI and loss of weight at diagnosis and autoimmune disease. Fasting C-peptide and insulinemia were also assessed. Results: (Slow type 1 diabetes versus type 1 diabetes). ICA (43% vs 70%; p < 0.01) and IA-2ab (16% vs 75%; p < 0.01) were more frequent in type 1. GAD ab were as frequent (62% vs 74%). Association of the three antibodies 1:15. 7% vs 58.5%; p < 0.05) were more frequent in type 1. Prevalence of GADab al one (27.5% vs 7.5%; p < 0.05) was higher in slow type 1 diabetes and with h igher levels (median 55.5 UI/ml vs 17 UI/ml; p < 0.01). There was no differ ence for levels of ICA (25.5 UJDF/ml vs 28 UJDF/ml) or IA-2ab (11.5 UI/ml v s 38.5 UI/ml), BMI of GADab positive patients was lower. Delay of insulinot herapy was shorter in GADab or ICA positive patients. We did not find any r elationship between antibodies presence and fasting C-peptide or insulinemi a. Conclusion: Slow type 1 diabetes should be evoked in atypical type 2 diabet es. Slow onset type 1 diabetic patients have different autoimmune patterns suggesting a different pathophysiological process. GADab and ICA are useful markers to predict future insulinopenia.