In may 1999, ministers of the Member States of the European Union responsib
le for spatial planning approved the European Spatial Development Perspecti
ve (ESDP). The document is the product of Member States and the European Co
mmission co-operating an the Committee on Spatial Development (CSD). The ES
DP is the work of a snail band of European planners. Between them they have
succeeded in putting European spatial development on the agenda. This is n
o mean achievement. However, the visualization of spatial policies in the E
SDP is weak. The Problem has not been lack of imagination but divergences b
etween European planning traditions. Also, attitudes towards European plann
ing cannot be divorced from those towards European integration. And, even i
f there was consensus on the 'high polities' involved, planning in the Euro
pean system of 'multi-level governance' raises difficult issues. The paper
proposes strategies, not for 'solving' problems, the solution of which elud
es us at present, but for sustaining the momentum. The first evolves around
INTERREG II C (soon: INTERREG III B). There should be provisions for teasi
ng out the implications far a future ESDP. Attention should focus on the 's
patial visions' that some programmes include. A Northwest European cluster
seems a good paint to start with. Another strategy is for the European Comm
ission to make explicit its own views, if necessary specifying where the Co
mmission differs from the Member States. These strategies should provide th
e impetus for a sustained commitment to the ESDP process.