Arterial blood pressure following different types of urinary stone therapy- Presented at the 8th European Symposium on Urolithiasis, Parma, Italy, 1999
Wl. Strohmaier et al., Arterial blood pressure following different types of urinary stone therapy- Presented at the 8th European Symposium on Urolithiasis, Parma, Italy, 1999, EUR UROL, 38(6), 2000, pp. 753-757
Objective: Several studies reported increased blood pressure (BP) values fo
llowing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment of renal sto
nes. It is unclear, however, whether this is due to ESWL, since nephrolithi
asis itself increases the relative risk of developing hypertension. Therefo
re we prospectively studied the BPs of stone patients undergoing different
types of treatment.
Methods: 252 stone patients (63% males, 37% females, median age 44.3, range
11.7-86.4 years) participated. 168 suffered from uretral stones: 50 underw
ent ESWL; 40 ureteroscopy, and 78 patients passed stones spontaneously (SP)
. 84 had renal stones: 60 underwent ESWL; 8 percutaneous nephrolithotomy/op
en surgery, and 16 no treatment. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP were
measured according to Riva-Rocci prior to, immediately after, and 3, 6, 12
, 18 and 24 months after stone therapy.
Results: Immediately after SP, SEP decreases, whereas after active stone tr
eatment increases (highest after ESWL) in SEP were seen. DBP was unchanged.
During the further follow-up, a gradual increase in BP was observed in all
groups. At 24 months in all groups, regardless of the stone location and t
ype of treatment, SEP and DBP were significantly higher than the pretreatme
nt levels (p = 0.000). There was no a difference between renal and ureteral
stones, or between the ESWL treatment and the other groups.
Conclusion: Renal stone disease itself rather than the type of treatment si
gnificantly increases SEP and DBP during a follow-up period of 24 months. T
he underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Kar
ger AG, Basel.