The paper seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the frontier bet
ween the legal and economic analyses of a contract. Toward that, specific s
tandards for its representation are introduced. This, then, allows for a be
tter-defined differentiation between an act and an obligation (a promise) t
o perform an act. The author's aim is to suggest that: (i) economics primar
ily deals with the exchange of acts and their valuation, (ii) the law focus
es on the exchange of obligations and their enforceability.
The paper demonstrates how to value obligations rather than the respective
acts. An obligation is conceived of as a "piece of property" to which a deb
tor and the creditor have respective ("negative" and "positive") shares. Si
milarly, a contract as a whole is treated as a "good" that has a value to i
ts contracting parties and that may be supplied and demanded.