In order to shed new light on the exercise and mis-en-scene of power in ear
ly Danish absolutism the present article draws on the German sociologist Ma
x Weber who split the concept of power into "Macht" (power) and "Herrschaft
" (authority). "Macht" constitutes the raw power of fist and gun but also t
he power inherent in market relations (e.g. the power of a monopolist). "He
rrschaft" on the other had is legitimate authority be it founded on common
interest, divine right, mutual exploitation or democratic elections. Any pe
rmanent political regime depends on a mixture of "Macht" and "Herrschaft,"
and rulers will normally try to minimize "Macht" and maximize "Herrschaft."
Danish Absolutism was introduced in 1660 with military backing and especia
lly in the years immediately following the coup d'etat "Macht" tended to do
minate. After a few years, however, the emphasis shifted to the constructio
n of "Herrschaft," which was cheaper, more efficient and softer on the king
's Christian conscience than the heavy-handed methods of "Macht." By means
of some case studies(the royal wedding 1634, the introduction of absolutism
1660, a series of political trials in the 1660s, the ceremonies connected
with the accession 1670) the dialectics of "Macht" and "Herrschaft" is anal
ysed and it is argued that the new absolutist regime consciously used its l
iterary clients, ceremonial and court culture as a means to create "Herrsch
aft" and compensate for the limited resources of "Macht."