Double sensitization to honeybee and wasp venom: Immunotherapy with one orwith both venoms? Value of FEIA inhibition for the identification of the cross-reacting IgE antibodies in double-sensitized patients to honeybee and wasp venom
F. Straumann et al., Double sensitization to honeybee and wasp venom: Immunotherapy with one orwith both venoms? Value of FEIA inhibition for the identification of the cross-reacting IgE antibodies in double-sensitized patients to honeybee and wasp venom, INT A AL IM, 123(3), 2000, pp. 268-274
Background: Double sensitization to honeybee (Apis mellifera) and wasp veno
m (Vespula spp.) as determined by skin test and measurement of specific IgE
is common in hymenoptera sting allergy. Double-sensitized patients have ei
ther distinct antibodies for each venom or crossreacting antibodies that re
cognize similar or identical epitopes in both venoms. Unfortunately, patien
ts often fail to identify the stinging insect which makes it difficult to d
istinguish cross-reactors from non cross-reactors. However, for economic re
asons as well as for the benefit of the patients, it would be useful to ide
ntify complete cross-reactors. Methods: In this study we investigated 24 do
uble-sensitized patients who were candidates for venom immunotherapy. Homol
ogous and heterologous FEIA inhibition was carried out with honeybee (Apis
mellifera) and wasp venom (Vespula spp.) preparations from two different pr
oviders. The inhibitor concentrations were ranging from 0 to 100 mug protei
n/ml. Results: Sera of 4 patients were completely cross-reacting for one ve
nom (3 honeybee, 1 wasp), 8 patients were partially cross-reacting and 10 p
atients were not cross-reacting. Two patients were excluded from the study
due to insufficient homologous inhibition. Data from specific IgE measureme
nts, skin test, and clinical history were not useful for the identification
of cross-reacting patients. Conclusion: FEIA inhibition is easy to perform
and useful for the identification of patients with complete crossreactivit
y. In these patients immunotherapy might be restricted to one venom which i
s beneficial for the patient and cost-effective. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karg
er AG, Basel.