Y. Umekita et al., Co-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-alpha predicts worse prognosis in breast-cancer patients, INT J CANC, 89(6), 2000, pp. 484-487
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) and its ligand, transforming growt
h factor-a (TGF-alpha), play an important role through the autocrine growth
-regulation system in several human cancers, including breast cancer. Howev
er, the clinical significance of co-expression of EGF-R and TGF-alpha has n
ot been elucidated. One hundred seventy-three female patients diagnosed as
invasive ductal carcinoma who had undergone a mastectomy (159 patients) or
breast-conserving surgery(14 patients) were followed up for 81 to 119 month
s (median 94 months) post-operatively, Immunoreactivity for EGF-R, TGF-alph
a, p53 and c-erbB-2 with paraffin-embedded carcinoma tissue was investigate
d using labeled streptavidinbiotin methods. Positive rates of carcinoma cel
ls were 27%, 33%, 32% and 26% for EGF-R, TGF-alpha, p53 and c-erbB-2, respe
ctively. Expression of EGF-R only was observed in 16% (28/173), of TGF-alph
a only in 22% (38/173), of both EGF-R and TGF-alpha in 11% (19/173) and of
neither in 51% (88/173). By univariate analysis, significant differences in
overall survival and disease-free survival were noted according to the coe
xpression of EGF-R and TGF-alpha (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), co-expression of
EGF-R and c-erbB-2 (p = 0.0029, p 0.0028), nodal status (p = 0.0028, p = 0
.0001), tumor sire (p = 0.0001,p < 0.0001) and c-erbB-2 expression (p = 0.0
034, p = 0.018), respectively. The status of p53 expression (p 0.01), estro
gen receptor (p = 0.042) and progesterone receptor (p = 0.046) showed signi
ficant differences in overall survival. According to Cox's multivariate ana
lysis, co-expression of EGF-R and TGF-alpha had the most significant effect
on disease-free survival (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (p < 0.0001), f
ollowed by nodal status. Go-expression of EGF-R and TGF-alpha by immunohist
ochemical detection is an independent prognostic indicator, and it may be h
elpful for determining the group of breast-cancer patients with an aggressi
ve phenotype. Int. J. Cancer(Pred. Oncol.) 89:484-487, 2000. (C) 2000 Wiley
-Liss, Inc.