Cytotoxicity evaluation of three tear substitutes used in the treatment ofdry eye syndromes

Citation
C. Debbasch et al., Cytotoxicity evaluation of three tear substitutes used in the treatment ofdry eye syndromes, J FR OPHTAL, 23(9), 2000, pp. 863-869
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE
ISSN journal
01815512 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
863 - 869
Database
ISI
SICI code
0181-5512(200011)23:9<863:CEOTTS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate cell tolerance of three tear substitutes used in th e treatment of dry eye syndromes. Methods: Cytotoxicity tests were done on a continuous human conjunctival ce ll line using microplate cold light cytofluorimetry. Membrane integrity, DN A condensation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (hydrogen perox yde and superoxide anion) were evaluated after 15 minutes of treatment or 1 5 minutes and 24 hours of cell recovery. Hyaluronic acid, hydroxypropyl met hylcellulose associated with sodium perborate (HPMC) and carbomer 934P were tested at their commercial concentrations (respectively 0.18%, 0.3% and 0. 3%) and after a 1/10 dilution. Results: Cell viability and chromatin condensation were not altered by hyal uronic acid for all concentrations and times tested. A decrease in membrane integrity was observed with 0.3% carbomer 934P after 24 hours of cell reco very and with 0.3% HPMC after 15 minutes. This decrease was amplified after 24 hours and associated with an apoptotic phenomenon. A H2O2 production wa s observed with HPMC associated with sodium perborate and an O-2 production was found with hyaluronic acid diluted at 1/10. Conclusion: Hyaluronic acid, carbomer and HPMC are in vitro well-tolerated even if HPMC induces a more important decrease of cell viability compared t o the other drugs. Hyaluronic acid, with its theologic properties, with no in vitro toxicity, seems to be efficient for dry eye patients.