Purpose: To evaluate factors influencing early post surgical ocular hyperte
nsion after phacoemulsification.
Methods: Records were collected for patients who had uncomplicated phacoemu
lsification with IOL implantation in the bag. Aspiration of the viscoelasti
c was performed at the conclusion of surgery. Patients with previous ocular
surgery, high myopia, or glaucoma were excuded. Intraocular pressures were
measured at six hours (+/-2) postoperatively. Following factors were analy
sed:
IOL material, PMMA, silicone, polyacrylic,
ophthalmic viscosurgical device characteristics,
ultrasonic duration,
intracameral pilocarpine injection at the end of surgery.
Results: 26% of the patients had an ocular pressure equal or higher than 21
mmHg. Among the factors we analysed, pilocarpine injection was the only one
to produce significant decrease in postoperative ocular pressure.
Comments: The acute postoperative IOP increase following phacoemulsificatio
n is presumably the result of trabecular obstruction by viscoelastic materi
al. However it can occure despite meticulous evacuation of viscoelastic, wi
ch could be dependent upon the material's viscosity, and IOL material and d
esign. Postoperative ocular hypertension is not related to ultrasonic durat
ion. Intracameral injection of pilocarpine significantly reduces the incide
nce of postoperative intraocular pressure increase.
Conclusion: Early postoperative ocular hypertension can be observed with di
fferent kinds of viscoelastics and IOL. Meticulous evacuation of viscoelast
ic from anterior chamber, although necessary does not always prevent this e
arly complication. Intracameral injection of pilocarpine can reduce its inc
idence.