This essay questions the privileging of the design of public over domestic
spaces and buildings in architecture and urban design, and their education,
and the identification of public space with a public realm seen as the loc
ation of democracy. It cites the case made by Doreen Massey that the divisi
on of public and private realms is gendered, allowing men the freedom of pu
blic affairs whilst confining women to domesticity; and argues that a duali
sm of public and private space ignores a third area of transitional spaces
which affect patterns of urban sociation. The case of redevelopment in El R
aval, Barcelona, demonstrates that public space may be, today, part of an a
nti-democratic strategy of gentrification. But, if public space constructs
a gendered public realm as imposition, there remains, as Hannah Arendt cont
ends, a need for locations of social mixing in which difference is visible.
What, if not public space, enables this?