Pharmacological criteria for ventricular assist device insertion followingpostcardiotomy shock. Experience with the Abiomed BVS system

Citation
Le. Samuels et al., Pharmacological criteria for ventricular assist device insertion followingpostcardiotomy shock. Experience with the Abiomed BVS system, J CARDIAC S, 14(4), 1999, pp. 288-293
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY
ISSN journal
08860440 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
288 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-0440(199907/08)14:4<288:PCFVAD>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background/Aim:The traditional approach to postcardiotomy shock includes in otropic support followed by the application of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Consideration toward insertion of a ventricular assist device (VAD ) becomes necessary when these maneuvers fail to restore hemodynamic stabil ity. The definition of maximal inotropic support, however, is lacking such that a standard formula for VAD insertion remains problematic. The purpose of this paper is to define the pharmacological thresholds for VAD implantat ion in the setting of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. Methods: The medica l records of all adult open-heart operations performed at Hahnemann Univers ity Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, from 1 July 1996 through 1 July 1999 were r eviewed. Specific data were collected on the hemodynamics and inotrope leve ls upon separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The hospital course w as reviewed with attention toward documenting hospital mortality. Cardiogen ic shock was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg, mean pulm onary artery blood pressure (mPAP) > 25 mmHg, central venous pressure (CVP) > 15 mmHg, and cardiac index (CI) < 2.0 L/min/per m2. Inotrope dosages wer e defined as low, moderate, and high according to assigned values.* A formu la for VAD insertion was established if cardiogenic shock parameters were p resent in the setting of two or more high dose inotropes. Early VAD inserti on was defined as implantation within three hours of the first attempt to w ean from CPB. The VAD recipients were divided into two groups. Group A were VADs placed in conjunction with the formula. Group B was VADs placed in vi olation (excess) of the formula. The results of these two groups were compa red.