Purpose: To evaluate the response rate and impact on quality of life of vin
orelbine given as cycles of 30 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks to patients with
malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Patients and Methods; Twenty-nine patients with histologically proven malig
nant pleural mesothelioma were enrolled (26 male patients and three female
patients; median age, 58 years [range, 29 to 77 years]). Seventeen patients
had epithelioid tumors, two had sarcomatoid tumors, and 10 had biphasic tu
mors. The International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system was used
: one patient had stage Ib disease, 10 had stage II disease, eight had stag
e III disease, and 10 had stage IV disease. Patients were treated with week
ly injections of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2). A cycle consisted of six weekly in
jections. The new guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid
tumors were used. Responses were measured by spiral computed tomography sc
an.
Results: All twenty-nine patients held measurable disease and were assessed
for response. There were seven partial responses (24% [95% confidence inte
rval, 10% to 44%]), 16 patients had stable disease (55%), and six patients
had disease progression on therapy (21%). The median number of vinorelbine
injections was 12 (range, 2 to 30). Quality-of-life analyses showed a benef
it for vinorelbine therapy.
Conclusion: Vinorelbine shows promise in the palliation of patients with ma
lignant pleural mesothelioma, The relatively low toxicity of the drug sugge
sts that trials of vinorelbine in combination with other agents should be f
easible. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.