Survey of Salmonella serotypes shed in feces of beef cows and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns

Citation
Da. Dargatz et al., Survey of Salmonella serotypes shed in feces of beef cows and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, J FOOD PROT, 63(12), 2000, pp. 1648-1653
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
ISSN journal
0362028X → ACNP
Volume
63
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1648 - 1653
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-028X(200012)63:12<1648:SOSSSI>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Salmonella prevalence on cow-calf operations was studied as a part of a nat ional study of health and management of the U.S. beef cow-calf industry and was conducted as part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System. Wit hin this study, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. shed in feces was determi ned. A total of 5,049 fecal samples were collected from 187 beef cow-calf o perations each visited on a single occasion. The number of fecal samples co llected per operation was predetermined based on herd size. Salmonellae wer e recovered from 1 or more fecal samples collected on 11.2% (21 of 187) of the operations. Overall 78 salmonellae representing 22 serotypes were recov ered from 1.4% (70 of 5,049) of samples. Multiple serotypes were recovered from eight samples from a single operation. The five most common serotypes were Salmonella Oranienburg (21.8% of isolates), and Salmonella Cerro (21.8 %), followed by Salmonella Anatum (10.3%), Salmonella Bredeney (9.0%), and Salmonella Mbandaka (5.1%). The most common serogroups identified were C-1 (33.3%), K (21.8%), B (16.7%), and E (15.4%). Even though the recovery rate of salmonellae from fecal samples was very low, 43.6% (34 of 78) and 38.5% (30 of 78) of the isolates were among the 10 most common serotypes from ca ttle with clinical signs of disease or isolated from humans, respectively. The majority of the isolates (50 of 78; 64.1%) were recovered from fecal sa mples from two operations. All isolates were screened for resistance to a p anel of 17 antimicrobics, and 87.2% (68 of 78) were susceptible to all of t he antimicrobics. The resistant isolates were most commonly resistant to st reptomycin (n = 9) and/or sulfamethoxazole (n = 9). Nine isolates showed mu ltiple (greater than or equal to2 antimicrobics) resistance most commonly t o streptomycin and sulfamethoxazole (n = 6).