Recovery of water maze performance in aged versus young rats after brain injury with the impact acceleration model

Citation
Ph. Maughan et al., Recovery of water maze performance in aged versus young rats after brain injury with the impact acceleration model, J NEUROTRAU, 17(12), 2000, pp. 1141-1153
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
ISSN journal
08977151 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1141 - 1153
Database
ISI
SICI code
0897-7151(200012)17:12<1141:ROWMPI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Clinically, elderly patients have a higher cognitive morbidity from head tr auma than young patients. We have modeled injury in aged rats in an effort to elucidate the pathophysiology of this enhanced sensitivity and, in parti cular, to determine if there are susceptibility differences in forebrain ch olinergic innervation in young versus aged rats. Aged (20-23 months) and yo ung (2-3 months) rats were subjected to injury under halothane anesthesia u sing the Marmarou impact acceleration model. Injury parameters required adj ustment downward for the aged rats (323 g at 1.61 m versus 494 g at 2.06 m) to provide equivalent mortality (30% versus 20%) and loss of righting-refl ex times (10-12 min average). At 1 week following injury, the aged animals were markedly more impaired in water maze performance than were young rats, and this difference persisted at least up to 5 weeks following injury, The extent of improvement in performance from 1 to 5 weeks was markedly worse for aged animals compared to young animals, Forebrain synaptosomal choline uptake was decreased in aged injured rats by 8-14% at 1, 3, and 5 weeks pos tinjury, but not decreased in young injured rats. No differences were noted in entorhinal cortex or hippocampal choline uptake. This model effectively demonstrates the markedly increased susceptibility of older animals to hea d injury and their decreased capacity for recovery. The neurophysiological basis for this difference is presently unknown, but the differences in cogn itive dysfunction between young and aged rats appears to be much greater th an would seem to be explained by the small differences in forebrain choline rgic innervation.