In vitro and in vivo determination of the UV protection factor for lightweight cotton and viscose summer fabrics: A preliminary study

Citation
K. Hoffmann et al., In vitro and in vivo determination of the UV protection factor for lightweight cotton and viscose summer fabrics: A preliminary study, J AM ACAD D, 43(6), 2000, pp. 1009-1016
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
01909622 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1009 - 1016
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-9622(200012)43:6<1009:IVAIVD>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background: One of the most important elements in the prevention of skin ca ncer is the use of comfortable UV-protective clothing. Owing to their low w eight, cotton fabrics, and especially viscose fabrics made from filament ya rns, are ideal for summer clothing and in fact enjoy a high degree of accep tance among consumers. Two methods are available for determining the IN pro tection factor (UPF) of textiles: the in vitro method is based on the spect rophotometric determination of the transmission of UV radiation through the se fabrics; the in vivo method is based on the determination of the minimal erythema dose for a test subject with and without textiles. Objective: This study was performed to assess the UPF of lightweight cotton and viscose fabrics and whether the use of these two methods to determine the UPF of viscose fabrics and cotton fabrics produces congruent results. Methods: We tested 7 different viscose fabrics and 7 different cotton fabri cs. Three of the viscose fabrics (ENKA SUN) had been specially treated, by depositing pigments in the fibers, to confer UV-protective properties. The determination of the in vitro and in vivo UPF was performed with a spectrop hotometer and sun simulator, respectively. Results: The in vivo measurements on the untreated viscose fabrics produced UPF values lower than those obtained from the in vitro measurements. For o ne of these untreated viscose fabrics, the difference between the in vivo U PF and the in vitro UPF was statistically significant (P < .05). In contras t, the in vivo measurements on the specially treated viscose textiles and o n the cotton fabrics resulted in UPF values higher than the in vitro UPF va lues. For one specially treated viscose fabric and 4 cotton fabrics, this d ifference was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion: Our results suggest, however, that-depending on the type of fab ric-determination of the UPF by the in vitro method is not in agreement wit h the in vivo method. In vivo measurements made with lightweight specially treated W-protective clothing showed in contrast to the untreated viscose f abrics that these garments offer very good protection against UV radiation. These results underscore the importance of developing and refining such UV -protective materials.