P. Flamen et al., The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer, J THOR SURG, 120(6), 2000, pp. 1085-1092
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective: To study the utility of whole-body positron emission tomography
with F-18-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) for the evaluation of recurrence
after curative resection of cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal ju
nction.
Methods: Forty-one patients with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of recu
rrent disease underwent conventional diagnostic work-up, including a spiral
computed tomographic scan, an endoscopic ultrasound, and a dedicated whole
-body FDG-PET. PET lesions were classified as equivocal or suspicious recur
rence. The conventional diagnostic work-up and PET findings were correlated
with pathology or with radiologic and clinical follow-up. Equivocal lesion
s were classified as positive.
Results: Forty recurrences were found in 33 patients. The lesions were peri
anastomotic (n = 9), regional (n = 12), and at distant sites (n = 19). For
the diagnosis of a perianastomotic recurrence, the sensitivity, specificity
, and accuracy of FDG-PET were 100%, 57%, and 74%, versus 100%, 93%, and 96
% for conventional diagnostic work-up, respectively (P = not significant).
False-positive PET lesions were found in patients with a progressive anasto
motic stenosis requiring repetitive endoscopic dilatation. For the diagnosi
s of regional and distant recurrences, the sensitivity, specificity, and ac
curacy of PET were 94%, 82%, and 87%, versus 81% (P = not significant), 82%
(P = not significant), and 81% (P =.0771) for conventional diagnostic work
-up. All false-positive PET lesions (n = 4) had been report ed as equivocal
. On a patient base, PET provided additional information in 11 of 41 (27%)
patients. A major impact on diagnosis was found in 5 patients with equivoca
l or negative findings on complete diagnostic work up in whom PET provided
a true-positive diagnosis. In 5 other patients the diagnosis was staged upw
ard from localized to extended recurrent disease, and in 1 patient with an
equivocal complete diagnostic work-up, PET correctly excluded malignancy.
Conclusion: FDG-PET allows a highly sensitive diagnosis and accurate whole-
body staging of symptomatic recurrent esophageal cancer. Further studies in
asymptomatic patients are needed to assess the potential benefit on surviv
al.