The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer

Citation
P. Flamen et al., The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer, J THOR SURG, 120(6), 2000, pp. 1085-1092
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
00225223 → ACNP
Volume
120
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1085 - 1092
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5223(200012)120:6<1085:TUOPET>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objective: To study the utility of whole-body positron emission tomography with F-18-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) for the evaluation of recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal ju nction. Methods: Forty-one patients with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of recu rrent disease underwent conventional diagnostic work-up, including a spiral computed tomographic scan, an endoscopic ultrasound, and a dedicated whole -body FDG-PET. PET lesions were classified as equivocal or suspicious recur rence. The conventional diagnostic work-up and PET findings were correlated with pathology or with radiologic and clinical follow-up. Equivocal lesion s were classified as positive. Results: Forty recurrences were found in 33 patients. The lesions were peri anastomotic (n = 9), regional (n = 12), and at distant sites (n = 19). For the diagnosis of a perianastomotic recurrence, the sensitivity, specificity , and accuracy of FDG-PET were 100%, 57%, and 74%, versus 100%, 93%, and 96 % for conventional diagnostic work-up, respectively (P = not significant). False-positive PET lesions were found in patients with a progressive anasto motic stenosis requiring repetitive endoscopic dilatation. For the diagnosi s of regional and distant recurrences, the sensitivity, specificity, and ac curacy of PET were 94%, 82%, and 87%, versus 81% (P = not significant), 82% (P = not significant), and 81% (P =.0771) for conventional diagnostic work -up. All false-positive PET lesions (n = 4) had been report ed as equivocal . On a patient base, PET provided additional information in 11 of 41 (27%) patients. A major impact on diagnosis was found in 5 patients with equivoca l or negative findings on complete diagnostic work up in whom PET provided a true-positive diagnosis. In 5 other patients the diagnosis was staged upw ard from localized to extended recurrent disease, and in 1 patient with an equivocal complete diagnostic work-up, PET correctly excluded malignancy. Conclusion: FDG-PET allows a highly sensitive diagnosis and accurate whole- body staging of symptomatic recurrent esophageal cancer. Further studies in asymptomatic patients are needed to assess the potential benefit on surviv al.