Purpose: We previously described an automatic procedure for diagnosing and
grading detrusor instability using a cystometric study. In our current stud
y we applied a modi tied version of the program in patients with urge incon
tinence treated with sacral neuromodulation to test its capacity to detect
changes after therapeutic intervention and understand the mode of action of
neuromodulation.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed cystometric studies before and after neu
romodulation in 26 consecutive patients, including 22 women and 4 men, and
evaluated parameter changes. We also assessed the relationship of instabili
ty parameters at baseline with symptomatic results, which were derived from
voiding-incontinence diaries, in female patients to identify urodynamic pr
ognosticators of success.
Results: The automatic procedure correctly diagnosed stability and instabil
ity in our patients in 51 of the 52 measurements considered. Neuromodulatio
n had an average suppressive effect on the amplitude of unstable contractio
ns. At baseline the amplitude of the maximum unstable contraction and mean
active pressure during unstable episodes were significantly less in the 7 w
omen who achieved stability than in the 15 who did not. However, no urodyna
mic parameters were identified that predicted the symptomatic outcome of tr
eatment.
Conclusions: Our algorithm accurately diagnoses and grades detrusor instabi
lity, and provides parameters with predictive value in regard to the probab
ility that a bladder may or may not become stable with neuromodulation. How
ever, the symptomatic result of this treatment option seems to depend on no
ncystometric factors.