Background. The debate on the association between nonphenacetin-containing
combined analgesics and renal disease has lasted for several years.
Method. A peer review committee of scientists, selected jointly by the regu
latory authorities of Germany, Switzerland, and Austria and the pharmaceuti
cal industry was asked to critically review data on the relationship betwee
n nonphenacetin combined analgesics and nephropathy.
Results. The committee regarded epidemiologic evidence on nonphenacetin com
bined analgesics as inconclusive because of sparse information and substant
ial methodological problems. The committee also noted that a diagnosis of a
nalgesic-associated nephropathy (AAN) in clinical practice usually depends
on information about exposure before or in the early stages of the disease
and is seldom accompanied by specific histologic evidence. The morphologic
finding of papillary calcification can arise from other conditions and is n
ot specific for AAN. For these reasons, the identification criteria for AAN
should be reappraised with scientific methods to validate the diagnostic p
rocedure. In the limited amount of experimental pharmacological data in hum
ans and animals, the committee found no convincing evidence to confirm or r
efute the hypothesis that nonphenacetin combined analgesics are more nephro
toxic than single formulations. For caffeine taken with combined analgesics
, the currently available information is not sufficient to postulate a harm
ful toxicological effect.
Conclusion. The committee's two main conclusions were that sufficient evide
nce is absent to associate nonphenacetin combined analgesics with nephropat
hy and that new studies should be done to provide appropriate data for reso
lving the question.