Hair relaxer, a commercially available alkaline product, is commonly t
he offending agent in caustic ingestion. These patients often experien
ce oral cavity and facial burns; however, no clinically significant es
ophageal injuries have been reported. Therefore, we questioned the the
rapeutic and economic efficacy of the ''standard treatment protocol''
that includes hospitalization and endoscopic evaluation. Twenty-six pa
tients over a 7-year period presented to our institution having ingest
ed hair relaxer. Presenting signs and symptoms, esophageal findings, a
nd cost of the standard treatment protocol were reviewed. Also, we ana
lyzed the caustic potential and current packaging of hair relaxer. Our
findings support modifications in the standard treatment protocol for
hair relaxer ingestion including elimination of hospitalization and e
ndoscopy in most patients. We also question compliance with childproof
packaging laws and suggest avenues for prevention of hair relaxer ing
estion.