The theoretical tissue model-based estimates of phase 1 and phase 2 duratio
n of biphasic waveforms are considerably shorter than the pulse widths curr
ently used in ICDs with standard tilt. This study used a tissue resistance/
capacitance (RC) model to identify optimal biphasic pulse widths. By paired
step-down defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing, the efficacy of standard
versus "tuned" biphasic waveforms was evaluated in 91 patients. Standard w
aveforms consisted of a phase 1 set to 65% tilt and phase 2 = phase 1. The
tuned waveform was based on an RC model of membrane characteristics with a
time constant of 3.5 ms. The optimal phase 2 truncation point is at the pea
k of membrane response. The optimal phase 2 duration ends with a membrane r
esponse near or just below 0. In paired analysis, no significant difference
s were found in DFT or impedance between standard and tuned waveforms. In p
atients with DFTs > 400 V, the tuned waveform lowered the DFT by an average
of 38 V (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses showed a significant inverse rel
ationship between DFT and impedance (P < 0.001). As impedance increased, th
e tuned waveform was associated with DFTs comparable to the standard wavefo
rm with shorter pulse duration and lower delivered energy. No single tilt v
alue allowing an easy calculation of delivered energy was related to ICD wa
veform efficacy. The use of ICDs with tuned optimal pulse durations offer a
greater flexibility of choice for patients with high DFTs.