Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger

This study compares the cognitive processes of high and low trait anger ind ividuals in terms of the appraisal components and core relational theme of blame identified in the Smith and Lazarus (1993) appraisal theory. Particip ants were asked to rate two social interaction scenarios? both of which res ulted in negative consequences. The intent of the antagonist in the video w as varied, as was the cognitive load of the participants. High trait indivi duals blamed the antagonist more, more readily identified another person as an antagonist, more readily identified circumstances as being of relevance to their own interests, and responded more angrily to the same events, tha n low trait anger individuals. These appraisal biases are more marked for h igh trait anger individuals when there is some ambiguity as to the delibera teness of the provoking event. Cognitive load did not affect appraisals. Th e implications of these findings for therapeutic interventions are discusse d. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.