The Eycott Volcanic Group, an Ordovician continental margin andesite suitein the English Lake District

Citation
D. Millward et al., The Eycott Volcanic Group, an Ordovician continental margin andesite suitein the English Lake District, P YORKS G S, 53, 2000, pp. 81-96
Citations number
68
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE YORKSHIRE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00440604 → ACNP
Volume
53
Year of publication
2000
Part
2
Pages
81 - 96
Database
ISI
SICI code
0044-0604(200011)53:<81:TEVGAO>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The Eycott Volcanic Group, at the northern margin of the Lower Palaeozoic i nlier in the Lake District, is the smaller of two substantial middle Ordovi cian (Caradoc) subduction-related volcanic successions that stratigraphical ly separate marine sedimentary successions of the Skiddaw Group and Winderm ere Supergroup. Tabular lavas and subordinate sills, in a sequence up to 24 00 m thick, mainly comprise porphyritic basalt, basaltic andesite, andesite and dacite, and are locally interbedded with thin units of volcaniclastic sandstone and pyroclastic rocks; these are overlain by 800 m of acid andesi tic pyroclastic rocks. The distribution and form of the lava/sill facies as sociation are consistent with emplacement as a lava plateau sequence, remar kably similar to the Birker Fell Formation, the lower part of the Borrowdal e Volcanic Group in the central Lake District. The Eycott Volcanic Group ro cks are geochemically coherent with characteristics transitional between me dium-K, continental-margin tholeiitic, and calc-alkaline andesite suites. R ocks within the suite can be linked by fractionation of an assemblage of pl agioclase, pyroxene, Fe-Ti oxide and apatite. A prominent compositional gap between about 58 and 65% SiO2 is attributed to the rapid precipitation and segregation of Fe-Ti oxide. Incompatible element concentrations in the maf ic members suggest that magmas were derived possibly from a subcontinental lithosphere source, similar to that of the Borrowdale Volcanic Group. The g eochemical differences between these two suites arose through the incorpora tion of different amounts of the subduction component and different fractio nation histories.