F. Guichard et al., Cloud-resolving simulation of convective activity during TOGA-COARE: Sensitivity to external sources of uncertainties, Q J R METEO, 126(570), 2000, pp. 3067-3095
Citations number
58
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
A one-week convective period of the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Exper
iment (10-17 December 1992), prior to a westerly wind burst, has been simul
ated with a cloud-resolving model. Large-scale advection derived from obser
vations is used to force the model, in the same way as usually done in sing
le-column models. Our aim is to evaluate this explicit simulation against o
bserved large-scale thermodynamic and radiative fields, and to investigate
the sensitivity of model results to observational uncertainties. Precipitat
ion, apparent heat source and moisture sink are fairly well reproduced by t
he model as compared to those diagnosed from observations. Temperature (T)
and moisture (q(v)) fields are also reasonably well captured except for a m
oderate cold and moist bias. Simulated moist static energy is too high belo
w 6 km and too low above, possibly because convection is slightly less acti
ve in the model than observed.
In order to investigate the sensitivity of model results to observational u
ncertainties, results are analysed with the moist static energy budget toge
ther with independent observational radiative datasets. This analysis sugge
sts that the atmospheric radiative rate that is in equilibrium with the app
lied large-scale advection and observed surface fluxes is too weak and that
its diurnal cycle is not realistic. The most likely reason for this proble
m is found to be related to uncertainties in the large-scale advection diag
nosed from observations. This analysis also indicates that the simulated hi
gh-cloud cover is too large in the model. It is greatly improved by increas
ing the ice-crystal fall speed. Additional tests show a large sensitivity o
f the simulated moist static energy, and thus T and q(v), to the range of u
ncertainties previously found for large-scale advection. The vertical struc
ture of the model bias is not significantly modified by changing the intens
ity of these forcings, but it is most sensitive to their vertical structure
s.
It is argued that it is crucial to get some insights into the range of unce
rtainties of external forcings (large-scale advection, surface fluxes and a
tmospheric radiative-heating rate) so as to assess the relevance of any eva
luation of simulated temperature and moisture when a model, either resolvin
g clouds or parametrizing them, is forced with large-scale advection deduce
d from observations.