H. Johannesson et R. Soderberg, Structure and matrix models for tolerance analysis from configuration to detail design, RES ENG DES, 12(2), 2000, pp. 112-125
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering Management /General
Journal title
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
A substantial amount of all quality problems that arise during assembly can
be referred back to the geometrical design, and especially the geometrical
concept of the product, i.e. the way in which parts are designed and locat
ed with each other. Special emphasis should thus be put on geometry design,
especially during the early design phases, to try to find robust concepts
and avoid solutions that may cause dawn-scream production problems.
This paper presents a generic set of evaluation tools for robust geometry d
esign encountering (i) potential tolerance chain detection in configuration
design, (ii) assembly robustness evaluation in concept design, and (iii) t
olerance sensitivity analysis in detail design. Special attention is given
to the development of a new matrix-based evaluation tool for the configurat
ion design part. The tool presented is based oil a new way of representing
geometry variation constraints QI an enhanced function-means tree structure
model. Different parts of the function-means tree that are of interest for
analysis purposes are then extracted and converted to matrix representatio
n. The reason for doing this is that the structure model is most suitable f
or modeling, but becomes unsuitable for analysis as the model complexity in
creases. For this latter purpose, the matrix representation is far better T
he use of the different fools is demonstrated in the design of a new vehicl
e front system for which the geometry a priori is unknown.