Hr. Eriksen et al., Effects of psychological defense on processing of neutral stimuli indicated by event-related potentials (ERPs), SC J PSYCHO, 41(4), 2000, pp. 263-267
The Defense Mechanism Test (DMT) is claimed to identify personnel with a hi
gh risk for accidents. A new explanation for why the DMT seems to predict p
erformance when survival depends on split second decisions is proposed. Six
teen right-handed, adult male students were tested with the DMT and with an
ERP paradigm (two sine wave tones, presented binaurally). Each subject was
tested with a one-stimulus paradigm, and a passive and an active oddball p
aradigm. Under the passive oddball condition, High defensive subjects diffe
red from Low, having significantly smaller N2 amplitudes (low immediate per
ception), and significantly larger P3 amplitudes (rely on later associative
mechanisms). High defensive subjects seem to have less ability to perceive
the environment correctly immediately. This slowness may be fatal when lif
e depends on split second decisions. The fundamental neurophysiological dif
ference may also be the basis for the very complex cognitive and perceptual
mechanisms involved in psychological defense mechanisms.