Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity: standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine

Citation
M. Berg et al., Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity: standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine, SOCIOL HEAL, 22(6), 2000, pp. 765-791
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
ISSN journal
01419889 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
765 - 791
Database
ISI
SICI code
0141-9889(200011)22:6<765:GPATPO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Does the increasing importance of guidelines in health care threaten the pr ofessional status of health care professions by reducing their professional autonomy? Or does it increase their position through enhancing their scien tific status? In this paper, we focus on this apparent contradiction by stu dying how Dutch insurance physicians created and used guidelines for the ev aluation of labour disability claims. Drawing upon the theoretical repertoi re of science and technology studies, we studied the role of the notion of 'objectivity' in these developments. A specific redefinition of objectivity played a core role in the active alignment, by the insurance physicians' p rofession, of the processes of guideline development and professionalisatio n. Simultaneously, it is argued, a specific conceptualisation of the positi on of the client was put to the fore. Guidelines, it seems, can be drawn up on creatively so that rather than embodying a potential constant threat to professional autonomy, they actually enforce it.