Ws. Marras et al., The influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on mechanical loading of the lumbar spine, SPINE, 25(23), 2000, pp. 3045-3054
Study Design. The effects of psychosocial stress on muscle activity and spi
nal loading were evaluated in a laboratory setting.
Objective. To evaluate the influence of psychosocial stress, gender, and pe
rsonality traits on the functioning of the biomechanical system and subsequ
ent spine loading.
Summary of Background Data. Physical, psychosocial, and individual factors
all have been identified as potential causal factors of low back disorders.
How these factors interact to alter the loading of the spine has not been
investigated.
Methods, Twenty-five subjects performed sagittally symmetric lifts under st
ressful and nonstressful conditions. Trunk muscle activity, kinematics, and
kinetics were used to evaluate three-dimensional spine loading using an el
ectromyographic-assisted biomechanical model. A personality inventory chara
cterized the subject's personality trails. Anxiety inventories and blood pr
essure confirmed reactions to stress.
Results. Psychosocial stress increased spine compression and lateral shear,
but not in all subjects. Differences in muscle coactivation accounted for
these stress reactions. Gender also influenced spine loading; Women's anter
ior-posterior shear forces increased in response to stress, whereas men's d
ecreased. Certain personality traits were associated with increased spine l
oading compared with those with an opposing personality trait and explained
loading differences between subjects.
Conclusions. A potential pathway between psychosocial stress and spine load
ing has been identified that may explain how psychosocial stress increases
risk of low back disorders. Psychosocially stressful environments solicited
more of a coactivity response in people with certain personality traits, m
aking them more susceptible to spine loading increases and suspected low ba
ck disorder risk.