B. Cosmi et al., Accuracy of a portable prothrombin time monitor (Coagucheck) in patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy: A prospective multicenter study, THROMB RES, 100(4), 2000, pp. 279-286
A portable prothrombin time (PT) monitor allows patients on oral anticoagul
ant therapy (OAT) to measure their PT at home. The purpose of the study was
to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a portable PT monitor (Coaguchec
k, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) as compared with laboratory method
s. The prospective study was conducted in four centers of the Italian Feder
ation of Anticoagulation Clinics. A one-month instruction phase was followe
d by a six-month surveillance phase. Seventy-eight subjects on stable OAT (
48 men, 30 women, age range: 18-75) were selected on a volunteer basis. Dua
l measurements of INR values were performed in each subject both from finge
r capillary blood by the monitor and from venous blood by the Anticoagulati
on Clinic laboratory in three instruction sessions. The mean difference (bi
as) of the monitor INR results when compared with the average of laboratory
INR and monitor INR results was -0.025 (limits of agreement -LA: -0.84/+0.
81 INR units). The mean bias was -0.0675 (LA: -0.37/+0.23), +0.018 (LA: -0.
39/+0.35), and +0.039 (LA: -0.49/+0.55), respectively, for INR values lower
than 2.0, between 2.0 and 3.0, and greater than 3.0. The overall precision
coefficient of monitor INR was 0.370, while it was 0.23, 0.46, 0.29, and 0
.21, respectively, in Centers 1, 2, 3, and 4. The overall variation coeffic
ient was 6.5% while it was 3.7%, 8.5%, 4.7%, and 4.9%, respectively, in Cen
ters 1, 2, 3, and 4. Coagucheck has an acceptable level of accuracy for INR
values in the range between 2.0 and 3.0. A wide variation in monitor perfo
rmance was found among centers. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights r
eserved.