Comments on "Wind-induced stresses in cherry trees: evidence against the hypothesis of constant stress levels" by K.J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, Trees (2000) 14 : 230-237 - Response to Klaus Mattheck's letter
Kj. Niklas et Hc. Spatz, Comments on "Wind-induced stresses in cherry trees: evidence against the hypothesis of constant stress levels" by K.J. Niklas, H.-C. Spatz, Trees (2000) 14 : 230-237 - Response to Klaus Mattheck's letter, TREES, 15(1), 2000, pp. 64-65