T. Hanslik et al., A survey of physicians' vaccine risk perception and immunization practicesfor subjects with immunological diseases, VACCINE, 19(7-8), 2000, pp. 908-915
Various publications have caused concern by implying that immunization may
be linked to new cases or flare-ups of immunological diseases (IDs). In vie
w of the resulting uncertainty, we studied physicians' vaccine risk percept
ion and immunization practices for adults with IDs. A questionnaire was mai
led to three groups of physicians in France: internal medicine specialists,
general practitioners, and travel clinic physicians. Thirteen vaccines cur
rently used for adults in France were studied. Risk perception was rated on
a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). The distribution of the answers was com
pared between and within groups of physicians. Potential associations betwe
en risk perception and reported practices were investigated by multivariate
analysis. In the three groups of physicians (n = 762), the tetanus and Sal
k poliomyelitis vaccines had the lowest risk perception. The yellow fever,
BCC and Sabin poliomyelitis vaccines were the least well perceived. The dis
tribution of risk perception for these three live vaccines and the hepatiti
s B vaccine was uniform according to VAS grading. For the other vaccines st
udied, the distribution was skewed to the low-risk perception side of the V
AS. Risk perception was greater for physicians who stated: (1) that certain
IDs carried a high risk of adverse events following immunization; (2) that
they sought the advice of the referent physician before immunization; (3)
warned their patients of the risk of an ID flare-up after vaccination; (4)
sought information about recent immunization in patients with a flare-up; a
nd (5) had experience of the side effects of immunization in adults with ID
. Risk perception was lower for physicians who said they updated immunizati
ons, and for the internists. The worse the vaccine risk perception by physi
cians, the more uniform the distribution of perception, thus reflecting the
disagreement of the scientific community about the risk of using such vacc
ines for adults with an ID. Risk perception and immunization practices were
related in adults with ID. Understanding of decisions concerning immunizat
ion may help to improve immunization updating and prevent risk amplificatio
n when evidence is lacking. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser
ved.