RESPONSE TO SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT WITH LYMPHOBLASTOID INTERFERON-ALPHAIN PATIENTS WITH PH-LEUKEMIA UNRESPONSIVE TO RECOMBINANT INTERFERON-ALPHA (RIFN-ALPHA-2A) AND NEUTRALIZING-RIFN-ALPHA-2A ANTIBODIES NEGATIVE( CHRONIC MYELOID)
D. Russo et al., RESPONSE TO SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT WITH LYMPHOBLASTOID INTERFERON-ALPHAIN PATIENTS WITH PH-LEUKEMIA UNRESPONSIVE TO RECOMBINANT INTERFERON-ALPHA (RIFN-ALPHA-2A) AND NEUTRALIZING-RIFN-ALPHA-2A ANTIBODIES NEGATIVE( CHRONIC MYELOID), Haematologica, 82(3), 1997, pp. 348-350
Nine Ph+ CML patients in chronic phase who were hematologically and/or
karyotypically unresponsive to recombinant-IFN alpha 2a (rIFN alpha 2
a) and neutralizing-rIFN alpha 2a Abs negative were shifted from rIFN
alpha 2a to lymphoblastoid-IFN alpha (IFN alpha-Ly) therapy. After 3 m
onths of IFN alpha-Ly treatment, the hematologic response was reinduce
d in 3 out of the 6 pts who were resistant to previous rIFN alpha 2a t
herapy, and was maintained in 2 out of 3 patients who were hematologic
ally but not karyotypically responsive to rIFN alpha 2a. After 6 and 1
2 months, the hematologic response was progressively lost, being prese
nt only in 3 out of 7 and in 2 out of 3 evaluable patients respectivel
y. None of the hematologically responsive patients achieved a karyotyp
ic response (Ph neg, metaphases = O%). One patient, who was hematologi
cally responsive, continued being treated with IFN alpha-ly for 36 mon
ths but he did not achieve any karyotypic response. The results of thi
s study suggest that in the unresponsive and neutralizing-rIFN alpha 2
a Abs negative CML patients a change in therapy, by using a non crossr
eactive type of IFN alpha would not be advantageous. (C) 1997, Ferrata
Storti Foundation.