Placebo-controlled, randomized, evaluator-blinded endoscopy study of risedronate vs. aspirin in healthy postmenopausal women

Citation
Fl. Lanza et al., Placebo-controlled, randomized, evaluator-blinded endoscopy study of risedronate vs. aspirin in healthy postmenopausal women, ALIM PHARM, 14(12), 2000, pp. 1663-1670
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"da verificare
Journal title
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
02692813 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1663 - 1670
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2813(200012)14:12<1663:PREESO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Background: Bisphosphonates are effective treatments for osteoporosis. Sinc e some primary amino bisphosphonates are associated with oesophageal injury , we conducted a study of the upper gastrointestinal effects of risedronate , a pyridinyl bisphosphonate. Methods: Healthy, postmenopausal women received risedronate 5 mg (n=26), as pirin 2600 mg (n=27), or placebo (n=27) daily for 14 days and underwent end oscopy at baseline, Day 8 and Day 15. Results: Oesophageal erosions were noted in one subject in the aspirin grou p, two in the placebo group, and none in the risedronate group, and an ulce r in one aspirin-treated subject. Gastric erosions and ulcers were observed most frequently in the aspirin group. Gastric ulcers were noted in eight s ubjects in the aspirin group, one in the placebo group, and none in the ris edronate group (P=0.010, placebo vs. aspirin; P=0.002, risedronate vs. aspi rin). Duodenal erosions and ulcers were observed in the aspirin group only. Gastroduodenal erosion scores of three or more occurred more frequently in the aspirin than in the risedronate and placebo groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Risedronate 5 mg was not associated with oesophageal or gastro duodenal ulcers in healthy, postmenopausal women, a population representati ve of patients who will receive risedronate in the clinical setting.